Accreditation intelligence for higher education

Know where you stand,
before reviewers do.

Credentia is an AI-native accreditation intelligence platform. It reads the evidence your institution already has, maps it to what your accreditor requires, shows you the gaps and the risks, turns it into insight about where you stand, tracks your progress as the evidence changes, and writes the narrative from your own source material. So you are ready all the time, not every few years.

See it in action →How it works ↓
Scroll to learn more
The workspace
credentiastudio.com · Standard 03 · Faculty
Draft narrative · Standard 03
Faculty Resources and Qualifications
Full-time
Computed
Qualified
Computed
Research active
Computed
1Gap identified
2Gap identified3Gap identified
How it works

From scattered evidence to a defensible narrative, with the whole picture in between.

01
Bring what you have
Upload the raw material: syllabi, CVs, assessment reports, minutes, plans, prior reviews. No template, no formatting. Credentia identifies each document and reads it.
02
Credentia builds the evidence
Every document becomes structured evidence: who your faculty are and how they qualify, what changed in the curriculum and when, how student learning is assessed. All of it computed under your own criteria.
03
See where you stand
Your evidence, mapped to what the accreditor requires: the ratios, the trends, and the gaps a review team would find. You see them now, not at the site visit.
04
Generate the narrative
When it is time, Credentia writes the full report for every standard from that evidence, grounded in your own source material. Your team reviews it, refines it, and signs off in one workspace, then exports it.
The platform

One platform, from evidence to submission.

Evidence ingestion
Any file, any format
Syllabi, CVs, assessment reports, board minutes, strategic plans, catalogs, prior reviews. Raw and unformatted. Credentia identifies each document, reads it, and turns it into structured evidence.
Faculty intelligence
Qualifications, computed
Every CV is read and every faculty member is classified under your institution's own criteria, with the ratios your accreditor asks for. Computed from the record, never guessed.
Curriculum intelligence
What changed, and when
Catalogs and syllabi across the review window, tracked year over year: new courses, substantive revisions, what is taught and how. The change story a reviewer wants to see.
Gaps and risks
What is missing, before anyone asks
Every standard is checked against the evidence behind it. Where something is thin, missing or contradictory, Credentia says so, and asks the question that would resolve it.
Insights
Your institution, in one view
Faculty composition, research quality, curriculum change, assessment of learning. The picture a leader needs before a review, kept current as the evidence changes. Ask it questions in plain language.
Drafting and review
A complete draft, reviewed and signed off
Grounded in your evidence, structured to the standard, cited back to the source. Your team accepts or revises suggestions, comments inline, and generates the full report with tables, citations and appendix, exported to PDF or Word.
Who it's for

Everyone who works on accreditation.

Provosts, deans and academic leaders
Know where the institution stands at any moment: which standards are strong, which are exposed, and what would move them. No waiting for a self-study to find out.
Accreditation coordinators
Run the whole cycle in one place: evidence, faculty review, gaps, drafting, sign-off and the final report. No chasing contributors across email threads.
Faculty and staff contributors
See only what you're responsible for. Answer the questions for your standard, review suggested edits, and submit. No need to navigate the whole document.
Where this goes

One evidence layer. Every framework.

An institution rarely answers to one accreditor. A business school, an engineering program, a law school and the university itself each have their own standards, cycles and reviewers, and each asks for evidence the others already collected. We are starting with business school accreditation, where our team has deep expertise, and building toward one continuously updated evidence layer that serves every framework an institution needs to satisfy.

Every framework
Each new set of standards is mapped onto evidence the institution already maintains, instead of being collected from scratch.
Every year
Each year of evidence makes the picture deeper and the next review easier.
Every cycle
Each completed review becomes institutional memory, not a folder nobody opens again.
The team

Built by people who've been in the room.

Credentia is built by business school professors who have led accreditation reviews and data scientists who build AI systems. It is the tool they always wished existed.

Business school professors
Faculty who have chaired accreditation committees and written the reports themselves. They know what a peer review team looks for, and where the process breaks down.
Data scientists
Engineers from large-scale AI and data systems. They build an engine that reads evidence faithfully, computes what can be computed, and never invents a number.

Start with what you have.
We'll build from there.

Upload your raw files. Credentia builds the evidence, shows you where you stand, and drafts the narrative when you are ready.

Open the workspace →